Immigration

    In the article Immigration crackdown — reality check: Our view I feel as though the article is intended for liberals.  The editor also gives an opposing argument that seems to be directed towards conservatives. The USA Today is known for being a mix of liberal and conservative ideologies which would make sense to target both audiences. The editor argues that new guidelines could cause many immigrants to be captured and deported. Immigrants who have followed the law are also susceptible to falling victims to deportation policies.  Although the editor makes claims of new guidelines he does not give the reader a reference to the source of the documents.
     In the opposing argument, the editor mentions that deporting immigrants that pose a danger or have been convicted of serious crimes is acceptable.  I agree with this, we should not have to support those who are not contributing to our nation in a positive manner. The article mentions that those who have committed minor crimes or have yet to be convicted also face the possibility of deportation. I feel this is unfair, we as a nation believe "innocent until proven guilty", yet are going to detain those who have not been tried. The editor also gives a polling number that shows most Americans  do not want more raids or roundups. The editor suggests that maintaining the program will only cause taxpayers more money. This suggestion is not supported by any evidence.I feel that the editor may have only struck more fear in some of the readers. There was no support or references to suggest that immigrants who abide the law will also be under attack.